A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning prospective neighbours about the development of a wall in a coastal internet site inside a north Dublin suburb, a situation that has captivated countrywide consideration next an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Times short article about René Collier along with the Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as an area disagreement has developed into a really publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction functions at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a firm director respectively, find to make their loved ones property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, the place advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of recognized inhabitants. According to the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming made by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both citizens of Dublin Street, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their organizing authorization by creating a wall past the boundaries in their internet site, resulting in an encroachment on a Exclusive Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result regions are issue to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have Long lasting ecological repercussions, notably inside of a delicate coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, which is partly created, is in the correct posture. Their authorized team has characterised the action being an try to hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding in an effort to maintain their view, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal organizing disputes, in which sights of The ocean are both of those remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described spectacular initiatives because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the location, In line with sworn evidence referenced from the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by midsection-higher h2o through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments, an image which includes since turn out to be emblematic from the depth from the dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they have been intended to Obtain visual evidence on the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from your sea Irish Moments claimed, describing how the two men entered the water for the duration of severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became Among the most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of actions were cited to show the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been coated in detail with the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be familiar with the track record and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders really should be granted to halt building pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second within the lawful timeline.
On the Main from the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain the wall, as made, goes further than what was accepted and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is referred to as meticulous in his assessment of planning paperwork, maps, and ailments attached towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally pressured that their action is determined by worry for environmental safety and adherence to arranging law. They reject claims that the case is about preserving a private perspective, insisting alternatively that it is about making certain that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have got explained their extended-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a pair merely wanting to make a spouse and children household in accordance with the regulation. They deny the wall encroaches on the Specific Space of Conservation and say that each one works are already carried out based upon Skilled guidance and authorized options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, including coming into the sea during a storm, usually do not change the fundamental info.
The case has also raised broader questions on how setting up disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours Paul Feely and René Collier in bitter court docket dispute about design of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for any situation a large number of observers see as more and more common. As sea ranges rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation amongst non-public land, public foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become more contentious.
The Irish Instances posting about René Collier mentioned the businessman experienced Formerly been associated with nearby advocacy on organizing and environmental challenges, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from very various professional backgrounds can find themselves aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, have become synonymous Using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from your sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-substantial h2o all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded by waistline-superior h2o during a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical truth of your coastline and also the symbolic nature of your act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated determination; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an too much technique.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the result remains uncertain. The court need to establish whether the wall as constructed complies with arranging permission and whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Space of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and scheduling ailments. But the human factor stays central: neighbours who should Dwell together with one another long once the lawful prices have already been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design will work at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, however the implications of the situation extend beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the necessity of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. It also underscores how quickly an area disagreement can escalate when essential challenges for example environmental protection and residence rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a location of all-natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre in the dispute stands partially constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful queries. Whether it is going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or completed as prepared will count on the court docket’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will likely continue to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Among the most intently viewed preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent years.